Registration Fees Grant Evaluation Criteria
1. Professional/Academic Development Potential (Total: 40 Points)
- High Potential (40 Points): Application demonstrates a strong potential for significant professional or academic development through attending the event.
- Moderate Potential (25 Points): Application shows some potential for professional or academic development, but less significantly.
- Limited Potential (10 Points): Minimal or unclear potential for professional or academic development.
2. Financial Need (Total: 30 Points)
- High Need (30 Points): Applicant demonstrates a critical need for financial support to cover registration fees.
- Moderate Need (20 Points): Some financial need is evident, but not critical.
- Low Need (10 Points): Minimal or less apparent financial need.
3. Active Participation (Total: 20 Points)
- High-Level Participation (20 Points): Applicant is contributing as a speaker, poster presenter, or panellist.
- Moderate-Level Participation (15 Points): Applicant will be engaging in knowledge advancement and networking.
- Basic-Level Participation (10 Points): Applicant is involved in a less prominent but still active role.
4. Clarity and Completeness of Application (Total: 10 Points)
- High Clarity and Completeness (10 Points): Application is well-written, clear, and all required sections are thoroughly completed.
- Adequate Clarity and Completeness (5 Points): Application is generally clear and complete with minor omissions or clarity issues.
- Poor Clarity and Completeness (0 Points): Application lacks clarity or contains significant omissions.
Total Possible Score: 100 Points
Scoring Guidelines:
- 80-100 Points: Excellent – Strongly meets all criteria; high priority for funding.
- 60-79 Points: Good – Adequately meets most criteria; consider for funding.
- 40-59 Points: Fair – Meets some criteria; may require further consideration.
- Below 40 Points: Poor – Does not sufficiently meet criteria; low priority for funding.